The 2026 State of Cannabis: A Legislative, Political, and Economic Analysis of U.S. State Policy

The 2026 legislative session represents a singular inflection point in the history of American cannabis policy, defined by the collision of federal regulatory upheaval and intense state-level political maneuvering. Unlike previous years characterized by a linear march toward legalization, 2026 has emerged as a year of complexity, contradiction, and retrenchment. The legislative landscape is currently shaped by three exogenous shocks that have fundamentally altered the calculus for state lawmakers: the executive direction to reschedule cannabis to Schedule III, the looming enforcement of a federal ban on hemp-derived intoxicating products, and the inauguration of new gubernatorial administrations in key battleground states.

This report provides an exhaustive, forensic analysis of the cannabis legislation proposed and active in United States legislatures as of January 2026. It synthesizes data from bill texts, committee hearings, and political forecasting to evaluate the likelihood of passage, the partisan dynamics at play, and the structural mechanisms proposed for new markets.

Current analysis identifies four distinct legislative vectors dominating the 2026 session:

1. The Sovereignty of the “Holdouts”: States such as New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Hawaii are engaging in their final, most desperate attempts to pass adult-use legalization, driven by the economic “bleed” to neighboring jurisdictions and the fiscal imperatives of state budgets.
2. The “Conservative Medical” Paradigm: Republican-controlled legislatures in the South (North Carolina, South Carolina) and Midwest (Wisconsin, Kansas) are crafting highly restrictive medical programs. These bills are designed explicitly to preempt broader legalization while providing political cover against the popularity of medical access.¹
3. The Prohibitionist Counter-Reformation: For the first time, a coordinated and well-funded movement has emerged in mature markets (Maine, Massachusetts, Arizona) to repeal adult-use legalization via ballot initiatives, leveraging “buyer’s remorse” narratives and public health concerns.⁴
4. The Hemp-Derived Crisis: The passage of the 2026 federal appropriations bill, which effectively bans hemp products with more than 0.4mg of THC, has forced states with robust “gray markets” (Indiana, Tennessee) to choose between total prohibition or regulating cannabis to save local agricultural economies.⁶

I. The Federal Overlay: The “Triple Threat” Environment

To understand the specific legislative mechanics in states like Pennsylvania or Wisconsin, one must first contextualize the federal environment that is exerting unprecedented pressure on state capitals in 2026.

1.1 The Rescheduling Mandate (Schedule III)

In December 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the Attorney General to complete the rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).⁸ This executive action has upended the traditional partisan divide. By framing medical cannabis as a legitimate pharmaceutical category acknowledged by the FDA, the President has provided “political air cover” for moderate Republicans in state legislatures.¹

• Legislative Impact: In states like South Carolina and Wisconsin, Republican sponsors are now citing the President’s order to argue that state obstructionism is no longer aligned with federal reality or the party’s standard-bearer.¹
• Economic Impact: The move to Schedule III removes the punitive IRS Section 280E tax code, which previously barred cannabis businesses from deducting ordinary expenses. State revenue committees are consequently revising their tax yield estimates upward, making legalization bills in Pennsylvania and Virginia more fiscally attractive.⁹

1.2 The “Hemp Cliff” and the Appropriations Ban

Simultaneously, the 2026 federal appropriations bill includes a provision—often referred to as the “Hemp Cliff”—that redefines legal hemp to exclude products containing more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per package.⁷ Scheduled to take effect in November 2026, this provision threatens to annihilate the multi-billion-dollar Delta-8 and hemp-derived Delta-9 industry that flourishes in prohibition states.

• State Reaction: In Indiana and Tennessee, where hemp businesses are significant economic drivers, this looming federal ban acts as a forcing mechanism. Legislators are rushing to pass state-level regulations that would protect these industries by bringing them under a state-legal cannabis framework, essentially legalizing cannabis to save the hemp farmers.⁶

1.3 The Partisan Realignment

The 2026 session confirms a fracturing of the traditional partisan monoliths. The Democratic party has largely unified around a platform of legalization with social equity components. However, the Republican party is now split into three distinct factions:

• The Libertarian Wing: Represented by legislators like Sen. Tom Davis (SC) and Sen. Dan Laughlin (PA), who view prohibition as government overreach.
• The Moral/Law Enforcement Wing: Represented by Gov. Kelly Ayotte (NH) and Gov. Ron DeSantis (FL), who oppose legalization on public safety grounds.
• The Pragmatist Wing: Legislators in budget-constrained states who view cannabis solely as a revenue stream to offset tax cuts elsewhere.

II. The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic: The Final Frontiers

The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions are currently a patchwork of mature markets (Massachusetts, New Jersey) and stubborn holdouts (New Hampshire, Pennsylvania). The 2026 session is defined by the intense pressure on these holdouts to harmonize with their neighbors.

2.1 New Hampshire: The “Live Free or Die” Paradox

Primary Legislation: SB 651, HB 1633, HB 1235, HB 198, CACR 19 ¹² Political Dynamics: Republican Governor (Kelly Ayotte); Republican Senate; Democratic House. Likelihood of Passage: Low (Statutory) / Low-Moderate (Constitutional Amendment)

New Hampshire remains the only New England state without adult-use legalization, creating an “island” effect where residents cross borders to Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont to purchase cannabis. The 2026 legislative session is characterized by a standoff between the House’s desire for legalization and the Governor’s entrenched opposition.

Legislative Mechanisms and Proposals

The flagship proposal, SB 651 (and the similar HB 1633), proposes a unique “Franchise Model” that differs radically from the private market systems in neighboring states.

• The State-Franchise Model: The bill empowers the Liquor and Cannabis Commission to oversee a system of state-franchised retail stores. This mirrors New Hampshire’s control over liquor sales, allowing the state to capture wholesale profits and franchise fees rather than relying solely on sales tax.¹⁶
• Possession and Cultivation: The legislation would legalize possession for adults 21+ effective January 1, 2026. However, bills differ on home cultivation. HB 1235 focuses specifically on allowing personal possession and cultivation without establishing a commercial market—a “decriminalization plus” approach intended as a fallback if the commercial bill fails.¹⁷
• Constitutional Amendment (CACR 19): Recognizing the Governor’s veto threat, Rep. Jonah Wheeler has introduced CACR 19, which would amend the state constitution to enshrine the right to possess cannabis. This measure requires a three-fifths majority in both chambers to bypass the Governor and reach the ballot.¹⁵

Political Analysis

The election of Governor Kelly Ayotte in November 2024 significantly hardened the executive branch’s opposition. Unlike her predecessor Chris Sununu, who signaled openness to a state-run model late in his term, Ayotte has maintained a strict prohibitionist stance.¹⁵

• The Senate Blockade: The Republican-controlled Senate tabled legalization efforts in the 2025 session and remains the primary graveyard for these bills in 2026. Despite the House passing legalization (HB 186 passed 208-135), the Senate leadership aligns with Ayotte.¹⁷
• Likelihood: While the “Franchise Model” was designed to woo fiscal conservatives, Ayotte’s victory makes statutory enactment highly unlikely in 2026. The focus has shifted to the Constitutional Amendment (CACR 19), but clearing the 60% threshold in the Senate is a formidable barrier.

2.2 Pennsylvania: The Budgetary Siege

Primary Legislation: HB 20 (Wheatley/Krajewski), SB 846 (Laughlin/Street) ¹⁸ Political Dynamics: Democratic Governor (Josh Shapiro); Democratic House; Republican Senate. Likelihood of Passage: Moderate to High

Pennsylvania is arguably the most critical battleground in 2026. Surrounded by legal markets in New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, and Ohio, the state is losing an estimated $250 million to $500 million annually in tax revenue to its neighbors.²⁰

Legislative Mechanisms

Two competing visions for legalization have emerged:

1. The Governor’s “State Store” Vision (Budget Proposal): Governor Shapiro has integrated cannabis legalization directly into his budget, proposing a model where the state manages sales, potentially leveraging the Fine Wine & Good Spirits infrastructure.

• Taxation: Shapiro proposes a 52% tax rate on cannabis, a figure significantly higher than neighboring states (e.g., Ohio’s 10%). Critics argue this would fail to eliminate the illicit market.²¹
• Revenue Allocation: The projected $500 million annual revenue is earmarked for education, transit, and restorative justice programs.²⁰

2. The Bipartisan Private Market (SB 846): Sponsored by Senators Dan Laughlin (R) and Sharif Street (D), this bill proposes a standard private-license model.

• Justice and Jobs: Focuses on social equity licensing and expungement of past records. It creates a “Cannabis Regulatory Control Board” rather than using the Liquor Control Board.¹⁹

Political Analysis

The political tectonics are shifting. For years, the Republican Senate was an immovable object. However, the 2026 session sees cracks in this wall:

• The Federal Cover: Republican Senators are increasingly citing the Trump rescheduling order as permission to engage. Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R) has moved from opposition to a stance of “show me the details,” specifically regarding federal compliance.²²
• Fiscal Pressure: With a divided legislature and a need for revenue without raising broad-based taxes, cannabis is the “least bad” option for GOP leadership.
• Likelihood: This is the most favorable environment for passage in PA history. The primary friction is no longer if, but how (State Store vs. Private License). Compromise is likely to favor a private model with high taxes, abandoning the full state-store concept to secure GOP votes.

2.3 Virginia: The Implementation Phase

Primary Legislation: SB 542 (Sen. Aird), HB 642 (Del. Krizek) ²³ Political Dynamics: Democratic Governor (Abigail Spanberger); Democratic House; Democratic Senate. Likelihood of Passage: Very High

Virginia legalized possession in 2021 but has operated in a chaotic limbo without a legal retail market due to the obstruction of former Governor Glenn Youngkin. The 2025 election of Democrat Abigail Spanberger has cleared the path for full implementation.

Legislative Mechanisms

SB 542 and HB 642 establish the regulatory architecture for the Virginia Cannabis Control Authority (CCA) to begin issuing licenses.

• Timeline: The bills explicitly state that no retail sales may occur prior to November 1, 2026.²³ This delayed start allows for the promulgation of regulations and the vetting of social equity applicants.
• Social Equity: A cornerstone of the legislation is the “Cannabis Equity Reinvestment Fund,” funded by tax revenues to support communities impacted by prohibition and provide capital for minority-owned micro-businesses.²⁶
• Market Structure: The bill rejects the state-run model in favor of private licensure. It includes provisions to transition the existing medical pharmaceutical processors into the adult-use market, giving them an early advantage.²⁷

Political Analysis

With a Democratic “trifecta” (Governor, House, Senate), the passage of SB 542 is largely a formality. The debate will focus on technical amendments regarding local opt-out provisions—specifically, whether conservative counties can ban retail stores entirely or merely zone them restrictively.²⁶ Governor Spanberger has signaled she will sign the legislation immediately upon passage.²⁸

III. The South: The “Medical Wall” and Conservative Reform

In the South, the conversation is strictly limited to medical access, but the specific proposals are distinct from the “medical marijuana” laws of the 2010s. These are “Conservative Medical” bills—restrictive, pharmaceutical-focused, and designed to prevent recreational crossover.

3.1 North Carolina: The Compassionate Care Act

Primary Legislation: HB 1011 (Compassionate Care Act) ¹² Political Dynamics: Democratic Governor; Republican Legislature. Likelihood of Passage: Moderate to High

North Carolina is poised to become the next Southern domino. HB 1011 has previously passed the Senate with bipartisan support but stalled in the House.

Legislative Mechanisms

• Restrictive Conditions: The bill allows medical cannabis only for a specific list of debilitating conditions, including cancer, epilepsy, HIV/AIDS, and PTSD. Crucially, PTSD diagnosis requires proof of trauma (e.g., active combat service), limiting the patient pool.³
• Vertical Integration: The bill mandates a vertically integrated market where a small number of suppliers must grow, process, and sell the product. This high barrier to entry favors large, well-capitalized multistate operators (MSOs) and limits small business participation.³⁰
• Advisory Board: Establishes a Compassionate Use Advisory Board with significant power to add or remove qualifying conditions.³⁰

Political Analysis

The Senate, led by influential Republican Bill Rabon (a cancer survivor), is fully on board. The House leadership has been the bottleneck, but the “Trump Rescheduling” narrative is being used effectively to argue that this is a medical, not social, issue.

3.2 South Carolina: The “Most Conservative” Bill

Primary Legislation: S 0053 / S 423 (Sen. Tom Davis) ¹² Political Dynamics: Republican Trifecta. Likelihood of Passage: Moderate

Senator Tom Davis (R) has introduced what he calls the “most conservative medical cannabis bill in the country.”

Legislative Mechanisms

• No Smokable Flower: The bill strictly prohibits the sale of smokable cannabis flower. Patients may only purchase oils, tinctures, topicals, and other non-combustible forms. This is a deliberate “poison pill” against recreational use.³³
• Pharmacist Dispensing: Unlike most states that use “budtenders,” this proposal requires dispensing to be overseen by pharmacists, reinforcing the medical framing.³³
• Timeline: The bill includes a “trigger” mechanism or delayed enactment to align with federal guidelines, ensuring the state does not conflict with DOJ priorities.³³

Political Analysis

In 2022, this bill passed the Senate but was killed in the House on a procedural technicality (revenue generation origination). Davis has reintroduced it with stronger procedural safeguards. The opposition comes from a hardline faction of House Republicans, but the Senate’s consistent support suggests momentum is building.

3.3 Kentucky: The Decriminalization Pivot

Primary Legislation: HB 198 (Rep. Kulkarni) ¹² Political Dynamics: Democratic Governor (Andy Beshear); Republican Supermajority Legislature. Likelihood of Passage: Low

While Governor Beshear has used executive orders to provide limited medical protections, the legislature is considering HB 198, a decriminalization measure.

Legislative Mechanisms

• Personal Use Quantity: The bill defines “personal use” as possession of up to one ounce of cannabis, 5 grams of resin, or 5 plants.
• Decriminalization: It removes criminal penalties for possession of these amounts, converting them to civil infractions or removing penalties entirely for adults 21+.³⁵
• Expungement: A key feature is the retroactive expungement of past misdemeanor cannabis convictions, a priority for the Democratic sponsor.³⁵

Political Analysis

This bill faces a steep climb in a GOP supermajority legislature that prefers a strict medical model over broad decriminalization. It serves primarily as a messaging bill for Democrats, contrasting with the GOP’s slower medical rollout.

3.4 Mississippi and Georgia: Incrementalism

• Mississippi (SB 220): A bill to fully legalize cannabis and remove it from the state’s controlled substance schedule. Given Mississippi’s recent and reluctant adoption of medical cannabis, this adult-use bill is highly unlikely to advance.¹²
• Georgia (SB 220): Focuses on strengthening the existing, highly restrictive low-THC oil program. The goal is to improve patient access to the limited legal products rather than expand to full medical cannabis.¹²

IV. The Midwest: Manufacturing, Agriculture, and Prohibition

The Midwest presents a sharp dichotomy: states like Wisconsin and Indiana are surrounded by legal markets (Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio) and are suffering massive revenue leakage, yet their legislatures remain paralyzed by internal GOP divisions.

4.1 Wisconsin: The “No Smoke” Compromise

Primary Legislation: SB 534 (Sen. Felzkowski / Rep. Snyder) ³⁷ Political Dynamics: Democratic Governor (Tony Evers); Republican Legislature. Likelihood of Passage: Moderate

Wisconsin is under immense pressure. Governor Evers supports full legalization, but the GOP legislature has refused. SB 534 represents the GOP’s “final offer.”

Legislative Mechanisms

• State-Run/Pharmacist Model: The bill proposes a highly restrictive system where medical cannabis is dispensed at state-regulated centers, potentially overseen by pharmacists.
• Prohibition on Smoking: Like South Carolina, Wisconsin’s proposal bans smokable flower entirely. Permitted forms are limited to pills, tinctures, topicals, and nebulizers.³⁹
• Qualifying Conditions: The list is narrow (cancer, terminal illness, epilepsy), excluding the broader “chronic pain” category that drives patient numbers in other states.⁴⁰
• Housing Protections: Interestingly, the bill includes provisions protecting registered patients from housing discrimination, a progressive clause in a conservative bill.³⁹

Political Analysis

This bill is a compromise that satisfies no one. Governor Evers wants adult use; the GOP base wants no use. However, the “brain drain” and tax flight to Illinois and Minnesota are powerful motivators. Passage depends on whether Evers is willing to sign a restrictive bill to get some program on the books.

4.2 Indiana: The Commerce vs. Ideology Battle

Primary Legislation: SB 286, SB 478 ⁷ Political Dynamics: Republican Trifecta. Likelihood of Passage: Low (Adult Use) / Moderate (Hemp Regulation)

Indiana is a unique case where the business lobby (represented by groups like “Indiana Cann”) is pushing harder for legalization than social activists.

Legislative Mechanisms

• SB 0286: A comprehensive legalization bill for both medical and adult use. It creates a regulated market structure similar to Michigan.¹²
• The Hemp Factor (SB 478): Indiana has a massive gray market for hemp-derived THC. SB 478 attempts to regulate this by placing caps on THC content (0.3% Delta-9, but historically looser on Delta-8). However, the federal “Hemp Cliff” (Section 1.2) threatens to wipe out this industry.
• Economic Argument: Advocates argue that Indiana is losing $171 million annually in tax revenue. The “Indiana Cann” group creates a “chamber of commerce” validity to the pro-cannabis argument.¹¹

Political Analysis

Despite the economic arguments, Governor Holcomb and legislative leadership have historically deferred to federal law. The Trump rescheduling order removes the “federal illegality” excuse, but deep-seated conservatism remains. The likely outcome is continued stalemate on adult use, with potential movement on strict hemp regulations to save local farmers.

4.3 Kansas: The Pilot Program

Primary Legislation: SB 294 (Medical), HB 2405 (Adult Use) ¹² Likelihood of Passage: Low (Adult Use) / Moderate (Medical)

SB 294 attempts to create a “pilot program” for medical cannabis, reflecting the state’s cautious approach. Kansas remains one of the few states without even a workable low-THC law. The adult-use bill (HB 2405) is effectively dead on arrival, but the medical bill has a pulse due to veteran advocacy groups.

V. The West: Referendums and Rollbacks

The Western states, pioneers of legalization, are now the site of the first significant “Rollback” movements.

5.1 Hawaii: The Referendum Strategy

Primary Legislation: HB 519 (Constitutional Amendment), HB 1246/SB 1613 (Statutory) ⁶ Likelihood of Passage: High (Referendum Referral)

After years of failing to pass statutory legalization (HB 1246) due to disagreements over police funding and expungement, Hawaii lawmakers are pivoting.

• The Pivot: HB 519 seeks to place a constitutional amendment on the November 2026 ballot. This “kicks the can” to voters, bypassing the legislative deadlock. If approved, legalization would start July 1, 2027.⁴³
• Why it Matters: This admits legislative failure. In a state with a Democratic supermajority, the inability to pass a bill highlights the complexity of creating a regulatory framework that satisfies unions, police, and growers.

5.2 Arizona: The Repeal Effort

Primary Legislation: Ballot Initiative (Citizen Initiated) ⁴ Political Dynamics: Citizen Initiative vs. Industry. Likelihood of Passage: Low

A group led by Sean Noble (American Encore) has filed an initiative to repeal the 2020 Smart and Safe Arizona Act.

• The Argument: The campaign argues that the industry has violated promises regarding marketing to children and public safety.⁴⁵
• Status: Cleared for signature gathering. They need 255,949 signatures by July 2026.⁴⁴
• Implication: Even if it fails, it forces the Arizona cannabis industry to spend millions on defense rather than expansion.

5.3 Idaho: The Constitutional Prohibition

Primary Legislation: HJR 4 ⁴ Likelihood of Passage: High

Idaho is taking the opposite approach of Hawaii. HJR 4 is a constitutional amendment that would ban the legalization of psychoactive substances permanently, preventing future voter initiatives from legalizing cannabis. This is a preemptive strike against the “Idaho Medical Cannabis Act” initiative currently gathering signatures.⁴⁶

VI. The “Rollback” Movement in the Northeast

A coordinated effort to repeal legalization is also underway in New England, funded by national prohibitionist groups like SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana).

6.1 Maine: Repealing the “Recreational” Experiment

Mechanism: Ballot Initiative (“An Act to Amend the Cannabis Legalization Act…”).⁵

• Goal: Repeal adult-use sales and home cultivation. Revert to a medical-only model with stricter testing.
• Status: Cleared for signature gathering.
• Political Context: Proponents argue that the adult-use market has increased addiction and failed to eliminate the black market. Opponents (the industry) argue this is a trojan horse to destroy legal businesses.⁵

6.2 Massachusetts: Buyer’s Remorse?

Mechanism: Indirect Initiative (“Eliminate Recreational Marijuana Sales…”).⁴⁸

• Goal: Ban commercial sales. Decriminalize possession of small amounts (1-2 oz) but remove the legal market infrastructure.
• Controversy: The campaign is facing allegations of using misleading tactics to gather signatures and is heavily funded by out-of-state interests.⁴⁹
• Likelihood: Very Low. The Massachusetts industry is worth $1.65 billion. Unwinding it would cause economic chaos, making voter approval unlikely.

VII. Florida: The Constitutional Showdown (Amendment 3)

While technically a ballot measure, the Florida situation involves intense legislative and executive interference.

Primary Mechanism: Amendment 3 (Constitutional Amendment).⁴⁶ Legislative Counter-Measure: SB 1398 (The Statutory Framework).⁵¹

• The Amendment: Would legalize adult use for 21+. It does not explicitly authorize home grow, a point of contention used by opponents.⁵⁰
• The Legal War: The DeSantis administration, through Attorney General Ashley Moody and James Uthmeier, has launched a criminal investigation into the petition gathering process, alleging widespread fraud. This “lawfare” is designed to disqualify the amendment before or after the vote.⁵²
• SB 1398: Senator Smith’s bill serves as a “shadow bill”—showing what implementation could look like (including home grow) to garner support, though the bill itself has no chance of passing the GOP legislature.⁵⁴

VIII. Comparative Analysis of Policy Mechanisms

Table 1: Proposed Tax & Revenue Models (2026)

Table 2: Medical Program Restrictions (Southern/Midwest Model)

IX. Conclusion: The Year of the Wedge

The 2026 legislative session is not merely about legalization; it is about the structure of the market and the political identity of the states.

1. The Wedge Issue: President Trump’s rescheduling order has successfully acted as a wedge, splitting the Republican party between its pro-business/libertarian wing (who support reform) and its social conservative wing (who oppose it). This is most visible in Pennsylvania and South Carolina, where GOP resistance is melting under the heat of “federal alignment.”
2. The Economic Imperative: In Pennsylvania and New Hampshire, ideology has been superseded by fiscal jealousy. The sight of tax dollars flowing to New Jersey or Massachusetts is the single strongest driver of legislation.
3. The Hemp Catalyst: The imminent federal ban on intoxicating hemp is the “dark horse” driver. In Indiana and Tennessee, lawmakers may be forced to legalize and regulate cannabis simply to save the economic footprint of their hemp farmers, who otherwise face extinction in November 2026.

As the session progresses, Virginia appears locked for implementation, Pennsylvania stands on the precipice of a historic flip, and Florida heads toward a brutal constitutional brawl. The era of easy legalization is over; the era of complex, high-stakes regulatory warfare has begun.

Data verified as of January 22, 2026, based on legislative filings and committee reports.Key Sources:.³

Works cited

1. Which States Are Most Likely To Legalize Marijuana In 2026?, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.marijuanamoment.net/which-states-most-likely-to-legalize-marijuana-in-2026/
2. Wisconsin – Marijuana Policy Project, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mpp.org/states/wisconsin/
3. North Carolina Senate Passes Medical Cannabis Bill – Maynard Nexsen, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.maynardnexsen.com/publication-north-carolina-senate-passes-medical-cannabis-bill
4. Marijuana laws ballot measures – Ballotpedia, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/Marijuana_laws_ballot_measures
5. Maine Officials Approve 2026 Ballot Initiative To Largely Repeal Marijuana Legalization Law For Signature Collection, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.marijuanamoment.net/maine-officials-approve-2026-ballot-initiative-to-largely-repeal-marijuana-legalization-law-for-signature-collection/
6. Wisconsin THC businesses prepare for end to federal loophole, accessed January 22, 2026, https://pbswisconsin.org/news-item/wisconsin-thc-businesses-prepare-for-end-to-federal-loophole/
7. Legislation to Delay Hemp Ban Is Introduced in Congress – NACS, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.convenience.org/Media/Daily/2026/January/14/2-Legislation-to-Delay-Hemp-Ban-Is-Introduced_GR
8. President Trump Takes Executive Action to Federally Reschedule Marijuana – NORML, accessed January 22, 2026, https://norml.org/blog/2025/12/18/president-trump-takes-executive-action-to-federally-reschedule-marijuana/
9. What Trump’s Executive Order to Reschedule Marijuana and CBD Means for the Cannabis Industry – McGuireWoods, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mcguirewoods.com/client-resources/alerts/2025/12/what-trumps-executive-order-to-reschedule-marijuana-and-cbd-means-for-the-cannabis-industry/
10. Rolling forward: Cannabis reform takes a new turn | McDermott Will & Schulte – JDSupra, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/rolling-forward-cannabis-reform-takes-a-5245084/
11. Business leaders launch advocacy group Indiana Cann to urge lawmakers to legalize cannabis – WFYI, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/business-leaders-launch-advocacy-group-indiana-cann-to-urge-lawmakers-to-legalize-cannabis
12. 2026 Cannabis Policy Reform Legislation and Voter Measures, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mpp.org/issues/legislation/key-marijuana-policy-reform/
13. New Hampshire House Passes Bills To Legalize Marijuana And Let Dispensaries Convert To For-Profit Status, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.marijuanamoment.net/new-hampshire-house-passes-bills-to-legalize-marijuana-and-let-dispensaries-convert-to-for-profit-status/
14. NH SB651 – BillTrack50, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1923192
15. New Hampshire – Marijuana Policy Project, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mpp.org/states/new-hampshire/
16. New Hampshire Cannabis Legalization Bill Summary HB 1633 — As Revised in the Senate, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mpp.org/states/new-hampshire/hb-1633-summary-as-revised-in-the-senate/
17. NH House Passes Pot Legalization on First Day of Session, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.businessnhmagazine.com/article/nh-house-passes-pot-legalization-on-first-day-of-session
18. House Bill 20 Information; 2025-2026 Regular Session – Pennsylvania General Assembly, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb20
19. Laughlin, Street Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Legalize Adult-Use Cannabis in Pennsylvania, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.senatorlaughlin.com/2025/07/10/laughlin-street-introduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-legalize-adult-use-cannabis-in-pennsylvania/
20. Bill that would legalize marijuana in Pennsylvania stalls out in state senate – CBS News, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/recreational-marijuana-bill-fails-pennsylvania/
21. Pa. Gov. Shapiro looks to legalize — and tax — marijuana to balance state budget – WHYY, accessed January 22, 2026, https://whyy.org/articles/pennsylvania-medical-marijuana-cannabis-josh-shapiro/
22. What to know about Shapiro’s pitch to legalize marijuana, its chances in the Pa. legislature, and more – News & Press, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.pajustice.org/?pg=News&blAction=showEntry&blogEntry=107655
23. VA SB542 | 2026 | Regular Regular Session – LegiScan, accessed January 22, 2026, https://legiscan.com/VA/bill/SB542/2026
24. 2026 Virginia Marijuana-related Legislation – Virginia NORML, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.vanorml.org/2026_legislation
25. SB542 – 2026 Regular Session – LIS, accessed January 22, 2026, https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/SB542
26. Virginia lawmakers showcase proposed cannabis retail market legislation amendments, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.wsls.com/news/2025/12/02/virginia-lawmakers-showcase-proposed-cannabis-retail-market-legislation/
27. Virginia Is for (Cannabis) Lovers: Frequently Asked Questions About Cannabis in the Commonwealth | Vicente LLP, accessed January 22, 2026, https://vicentellp.com/insights/virginia-cannabis-legalization-faq-2026/
28. Virginia election a victory for cannabis policy! – Blog, accessed January 22, 2026, https://blog.mpp.org/blog/virginia-election-a-victory-for-cannabis-policy/
29. NC H1011 | BillTrack50, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1886075/28939
30. NC COMPASSIONATE CARE ACT. – Legislative Reporting Service, accessed January 22, 2026, https://lrs.sog.unc.edu/bill/nc-compassionate-care-act-1
31. Trump’s Marijuana Rescheduling Move Could Boost South Carolina Medical Cannabis Bill, GOP Lawmaker Says, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.marijuanamoment.net/trumps-marijuana-rescheduling-move-could-boost-south-carolina-medical-cannabis-bill-gop-lawmaker-says/
32. South Carolina Compassionate Care Act – Maynard Nexsen, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.maynardnexsen.com/publication-south-carolina-compassionate-care-act
33. Lowcountry Senator believes medical marijuana bill could pass this session – YouTube, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8dz7H7pFws
34. KY HB198 | 2026 | Regular Session – LegiScan, accessed January 22, 2026, https://legiscan.com/KY/bill/HB198/2026?utm_campaign=rss&guid=5qxndJNAjE6czSlSvnzGFu
35. Commonwealth of Kentucky – Legislative Research Commission, accessed January 22, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/recorddocuments/note/26RS/hb198/LM.pdf
36. KY HB198 – BillTrack50, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1923348
37. Bill Text – Wisconsin Legislature: SB534, accessed January 22, 2026, https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2025/REG/SB534
38. AB 547/SB 534: Medical Cannabis – ACLU of Wisconsin, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.aclu-wi.org/legislation/ab-547-sb-534-medical-cannabis/
39. 2025 SENATE BILL 534 – Wisconsin Legislative Documents, accessed January 22, 2026, https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2025/REG/SB534.pdf
40. Medical Cannabis Bill Summary – Marijuana Policy Project, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.mpp.org/states/wisconsin/medical-cannabis-bill-summary/
41. Indiana AG Pushes Back on THC Legislation | Regulatory Oversight, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.regulatoryoversight.com/2025/04/indiana-ag-pushes-back-on-thc-legislation/
42. SB 294 | Bills and Resolutions | Kansas State Legislature, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.kslegislature.gov/li/b2025_26/measures/sb294/
43. Hawaii Lawmakers File Bills To Put Marijuana Legalization On The Ballot For Voters To Decide, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.marijuanamoment.net/hawaii-lawmakers-file-bills-to-put-marijuana-legalization-on-the-ballot-for-voters-to-decide/
44. Arizona Repeal Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2026) – Ballotpedia, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_Repeal_Marijuana_Legalization_Initiative_(2026)
45. Repeal of Arizona’s recreational marijuana law could head to 2026 ballot, accessed January 22, 2026, https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2025/12/19/repeal-of-arizonas-recreational-marijuana-law-could-head-to-2026-ballot/
46. 2026 Cannabis Ballot Measures: Will Progress Be Pushed Forward or Rolled Back?, accessed January 22, 2026, https://blog.mpp.org/blog/2026-cannabis-ballot-measures-will-progress-be-pushed-forward-or-rolled-back/
47. Maine Criminalize the Use of Recreational Marijuana Initiative (2026) – Ballotpedia, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/Maine_Criminalize_the_Use_of_Recreational_Marijuana_Initiative_(2026)
48. Massachusetts Eliminate Recreational Marijuana Sales and Allow Limited Possession Initiative (2026) – Ballotpedia, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/Massachusetts_Eliminate_Recreational_Marijuana_Sales_and_Allow_Limited_Possession_Initiative_(2026)
49. Group behind cannabis repeal effort in Massachusetts accused of using misleading tactics, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.wamc.org/news/2026-01-21/group-behind-cannabis-repeal-effort-in-massachusetts-accused-of-using-misleading-tactics
50. Smart & Safe Florida: Home, accessed January 22, 2026, https://smartandsafeflorida.com/
51. Senate Bill 1398 (2026) – The Florida Senate, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/1398/?Tab=BillHistory
52. Florida is arresting marijuana legalization campaign workers, accessed January 22, 2026, https://mjbizdaily.com/news/florida-law-enforcement-is-arresting-adult-use-marijuana-legalization-campaign-workers/614084/
53. Up in smoke? James Uthmeier amps up criminal probe of pot petitions, accessed January 22, 2026, https://floridapolitics.com/archives/774963-up-in-smoke-james-uthmeier-amps-up-criminal-probe-of-pot-petitions/
54. FL S1398 | BillTrack50, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1923771
55. Senate Bill 1398 (2026) – The Florida Senate, accessed January 22, 2026, https://flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/1398/ByVersion